Perfetto v. FNU Harmon et al
Jonathon Andrew Perfetto |
FNU Harmon, John/Jane Doe Director of Nursing, Cynthia Wolken, Connie Winner, FNU Shute, Paul Rees, Ray Hunt, Michelle Steyh, Mark Lockerie, FNU Pasha, Sgt. Carla Strutzel, FNU Wirth, Jim Salmonsen, Terrie Stefalo, D.J. Godfrey, Barbara Swanson and John/Jane Doe x3 Religious Issues Committee |
6:2022cv00080 |
September 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Sam E Haddon |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Perfetto. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 9/30/2022. Mailed to MSP; Transmitted electronically to prison for delivery to inmate. (TAG) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 9/30/2022. Transmitted electronically to prison for delivery to inmate. (TAG) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner. Transmitted electronically to prison for delivery to inmate. (TAG) |
Filing 2 LODGED COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER (78 pgs.) (Filing fee $ 402 not paid), filed by Jonathon Andrew Perfetto. (TAG) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (2 pgs.) by Plaintiff Jonathon Andrew Perfetto (Attachments: #1 Account Statement (2 pgs.)) (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.