Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Johnson v. Godfrey et al
as 4:2024cv00105
Respondent:
D.J. Godfrey and Austin Knudsen
Petitioner:
Shane Clark Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State of Montana et al
as 4:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Karl Smith
Defendant:
Ms. Ross, Core Civic Inc., Montana State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strizich v. Guyer, et al.
as 24-4708
Plaintiff:
JORY STRIZICH
Defendant:
KRISTY COBBAN, JAMES MILLIGAN, D.J. GODFREY and others
Smith v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Zachariah Justin Daniel Smith
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen, Scott McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perfetto v. FNU Harmon et al
as 6:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Andrew Perfetto
Defendant:
FNU Harmon, John/Jane Doe Director of Nursing, Cynthia Wolken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christenson v. Tamcke et al
as 6:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Richard John Christenson
Defendant:
Kayla Tamcke, Sgt. Carla Strutzel, D.J. Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Anthony Bartlett, Larry Pasha, Billie Riche and others
Plaintiff:
Spencer Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitford v. Michael et al
as 6:2020cv00080
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Cynthia Wolken, Reginald D. Michael and others
Plaintiff:
Makueeyapee D. Whitford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Daugherty et al
as 6:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, D.J. Godfrey, Carla Stretzel and others
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strizich v. Guyer et al
as 6:2020cv00040
Defendant:
James Milligan, Kristy Cobban, Billie Reich and others
Plaintiff:
Jory Strizich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
