Flowers v. Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2004cv03033
Filed: February 13, 2004
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The motion for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (filing 43 ) is granted as follows: Flowers' attorney is entitled to an attorney fee of $23,237.00 from Flowers' past-due benefits. Flowers' attorney may collect $23,237.00 from the funds Flowers deposited in his trust account to pay the attorney fee. However, Flowers' counsel shall immediately refund to Flowers $6,113.25, which is the full amount of attorney's fees p reviously awarded under the EAJA, and any additional funds from the trust account belonging to Flowers. Flowers and Flowers' attorney shall provide Defendant with documentation showing that the attorney's fee has been paid. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Judgment shall be entered by separate document. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (TEL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flowers v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?