Flowers v. Social Security Administration
4:2004cv03033 |
February 13, 2004 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
4 Lincoln Office |
Richard G. Kopf |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The motion for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (filing 43 ) is granted as follows: Flowers' attorney is entitled to an attorney fee of $23,237.00 from Flowers' past-due benefits. Flowers' attorney may collect $23,237.00 from the funds Flowers deposited in his trust account to pay the attorney fee. However, Flowers' counsel shall immediately refund to Flowers $6,113.25, which is the full amount of attorney's fees p reviously awarded under the EAJA, and any additional funds from the trust account belonging to Flowers. Flowers and Flowers' attorney shall provide Defendant with documentation showing that the attorney's fee has been paid. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Judgment shall be entered by separate document. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (TEL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Flowers v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.