El-Tabech v. Houston, et al
Mohamed A. El-Tabech |
Francis Britten, Mary Carmichael, Paul Church, Harold Clarke, Randy Cole, Elizabeth Conley, Robert Houston, Mike Kenney, Douglas Sell, Brian Shipman, Dave Thomas and Janssen Williams |
4:2004cv03231 |
October 16, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
4 Lincoln Office |
Joseph F. Bataillon |
Thomas D. Thalken |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 282 ORDER to Withdraw Exhibits or to Show Cause Why Exhibits Should Not be Destroyed. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MLF, ) |
Filing 279 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees and costs (Filing No. 270 ) is denied as moot. Plaintiff's amended motion for attorneys' fees and costs (Filing No. 278 ) is granted. Attorneys' fees in the amo unt of $73,209.67, plus interest at the legal rate under 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from and after this date, are assessed in favor of plaintiff and against defendants, payable to plaintiff's counsel. Costs in the amount of $935.40, plus i nterest at the legal rate under 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from and after this date, are taxed in favor of a plaintiff and against defendants, payable to plaintiff's counsel. A judgment in conformity with this memorandum and order will be entered this date. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JAB) |
Filing 266 ORDER - This matter is before the court after a telephonic scheduling conference with the parties after remand from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff shall submit a fee application for the contested supplemental attorney fees on or before December 6, 2010. 2. Defendants shall respond thereto by December 20, 2010. 3. Plaintiff shall file a satisfaction of judgment (Filing No. 204 ) on or before November 17, 2010. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JAB) |
Filing 252 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendants' motion for a stay of enforcement of the judgment 249 is denied. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (KBJ) |
Filing 243 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's supplemental motion for attorney's fees 233 is granted. Plaintiff is awarded an additional $73,360.20 in attorney's fees and $271.20 in recoverable costs. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (KBJ) |
Filing 242 ORDER - This matter is before the court on Assistant Attorney General Matthew A. Workss motion to withdraw as counsel 241 . Assistant Attorney General Ryan C. Gilbride has entered an appearance. Accordingly, Assistant Attorney General Matthew A. Works's motion to withdraw as counsel 241 is granted. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (KBJ) |
Filing 226 ORDER 1. Plaintiffs objection to defendants brief and evidence 217 is overruled. 2. Plaintiffs motion for contempt is set for oral argument on February 19, 2009, at 3:00 p.m., Courtroom No. 3, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (PCV, ) |
Filing 222 ORDER granting 219 Motion to Extend. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:1. Plaintiff shall file Reply Brief and Index of Evidence in Support of Motionfor Contempt on or before November 7, 2008. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (PCV, ) |
Filing 198 ORDER granting 197 Defendants' Motion to Extend Time until 2/8/2008 to file response to 191 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (SMS, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.