Davis v. Ashford
4:2006cv03013 |
January 23, 2006 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
4 Lincoln Office |
Richard G. Kopf |
Pro Se Docket |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding: Interlocutory Appeal7, filed by Plaintiff. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: 1. That leave to proceed IFP on appeal is denied;2. That the Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Memorandum and Order tothe parties and the Ei ghth Circuit Court of Appeals as the notice required by Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4), and the Clerk shall process the appeal to the Eighth Circuit; and 3. That the plaintiff may file a motion in the Court of Appeals for leave to proceed IFP on appeal. Signed by Judge Richard G. Kopf on 2/3/2006. (JAR) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. filing no. 2, the plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP, is denied, and by February 24, 2006, the plaintiff shall pay the court's $250 filing fee for this case. That in the absence of the entire $250 filing fee by February 24, 2006, this case may be subject, without further notice, to dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard G. Kopf on 1/25/2006. (JAR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Davis v. Ashford | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.