Knight v. Edelman et al
Case Number: |
4:2006cv03065 |
Filed: |
March 24, 2006 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Office: |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Presiding Judge: |
Joseph F. Bataillon |
Presiding Judge: |
Pro Se Docket |
Nature of Suit: |
None |
Cause of Action: |
Federal Question |
Jury Demanded By: |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
October 21, 2009 |
Filing
112
ORDER - Pursuant to NECivR 79.1(f) or NECrimR 55.1(g), counsel for Defendant shall either a) withdraw the following exhibits previously submitted in this matter within 15 calendar days of the date of this order, or 2) show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed: Exhibit nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 24 from non-jury trial - 3/24/2009Ordered by Judge Karen E. Schreier. (PCV, )
|
July 28, 2009 |
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Ordered by Judge Karen E. Schreier. (Schreier, Karen)
|
March 18, 2009 |
Filing
100
ORDER denying 98 Motion to Continue Trial. Ordered by Judge Karen E. Schreier. (Schreier, Karen)
|
March 9, 2009 |
Filing
95
ORDER denying 91 Motion to Amend Complaint; denying as moot 92 Objection. Ordered by Judge Karen E. Schreier. (Schreier, Karen)
|
February 17, 2009 |
Filing
83
ORDER denying 79 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by Judge Karen E. Schreier. (Schreier, Karen)
|
January 7, 2009 |
Filing
72
GENERAL ORDER 09-01- Effective immediately, this case is reassigned from Judge Bataillon to Judge Schreier for the purpose of trial. The magistrate judge will remain unchanged. The case will be called for trial in the Special Proceedings Courtroom on February 9, 2009. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
September 10, 2008 |
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Final Pretrial Conference in this matter will take place before Magistrate Judge David L. Piester on September 30, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. Prior to the Final Pretrial Conference, all items as directed in NeCivR 16.2 and full pre paration shall have been completed so that trial may begin at any time following the Final Pretrial Conference. The Final Pretrial Conference will be conducted by telephone. Defendant's counsel shall arrange to initiate and place the conference call. The Clerk of the court is directed to provide a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Magistrate Judge Piester. ( Pretrial Conference set for 9/30/2008 at 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge David L. Piester.) Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (Copy forwarded to Magistrate Judge Piester). (JAE, )
|
September 4, 2008 |
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 61 Motion to Extend; as the parties have been previously informed, the Final Pretrial Conference will be held before Magistrate Judge David L. Piester on September 30, 2008 at 10:00 a.m.; the Final Pretrial Conference w ill take place at the Robert V. Denney Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall South, Lincoln, Nebraska, in courtroom number two; no further extensions of time will be permitted; in the event that Plaintiff fails to appear at the Final Pretrial Conference, this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice for failure to prosecute this matter diligently. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (copy mailed to pro se party)(CJP)
|
February 12, 2007 |
Filing
40
COPY OF ORDER from USBC-NE (BK06-41610, A04106) regarding Letter33 (Suggestion of Bankruptcy) filed by Tyrell Knight. Motion to Dismiss case is granted. Ordered by Judge Thomas L. Saladino on 2/7/2007. (JAR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?