Pinto Creek Company v. Affinity Production Company et al
| 4:2006cv03272 |
| November 15, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| David L. Piester |
| Agriculture Acts |
| 07 U.S.C. ยง 499 Agricultural Commodities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER - Plaintiff's request for an ex parte order for an accounting and injunctive relief, as requested in paragraph 35 of Plaintiff's complaint, is denied. If Plaintiff desires the issuance of preliminary injunction or a temporary restrain ing order, it shall (a) file a separate motion for a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order, (b) serve the motion upon each defendant, and (c) after consulting with Defendants' attorney(s) (without regard to whether the attorney has yet entered an appearance), contact the secretary for the undersigned United States District Judge to schedule a telephone conference call between counsel for the parties and the undersigned United States District Judge to discuss the motion and the need for, and timing of, a formal hearing. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (CS, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pinto Creek Company v. Affinity Production Company et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
