Duncan Aviation, Inc. v. River Run Projects
| Duncan Aviation, Inc. |
| River Run Projects |
| River Run Projects |
| Duncan Aviation, Inc. |
| 4:2007cv03035 |
| February 2, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Lancaster |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| David L. Piester |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - 1. Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment (filing 11) is granted; 2. This court's March 19, 2007 judgment (filing 9) dismissing this action for lack of personal jurisdiction is vacated; 3. The proposed brief (filing 13, ex. 5) and evidence (filing 13, exs. 2-4) opposing the motion to dismiss which were submitted in support of the motion for relief from judgment are accepted and deemed to be filed in opposition to the motion to dismiss; 4. Defendant s hall have until May 4, 2007 to file a reply brief and index of evidence; 5. The motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (filing 3) will be deemed submitted on May 5, 2007; 6. The Clerk of the Court shall reopen this matter for statistical purposes and make an entry in the CM/ECF system indicating that the motion to dismiss (filing 3) is ripe for decision on May 5, 2007. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf.(CS, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
