Hansen v. Dohmen et al
Plaintiff: Meaghan Elizabeth Hansen
Defendant: Linda Dohmen and Jane Doe
Case Number: 4:2007cv03159
Filed: June 18, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
County: Lancaster
Presiding Judge: David L. Piester
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 25 U.S.C. ยง 1901 Indian Child Welfare Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER approving 51 Joint Stipulation for dismissal. This matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their own costs. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)
June 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Pursuant to the parties' notice that this case is settled, the court issued an order on May 5, 2009 which gave the parties thirty days to file a joint stipulation for dismissal or other dispositive stipulation for entry of a final judgment in this case. Filing No. 49 . Thirty days have passed, but the parties have failed to comply with the court's order, and have failed to explain why they have not and/or cannot file dismissal documents. IT THEREFORE HEREBY IS O RDERED: On or before 1:00 p.m. on June 12, 2009, the parties shall either file their joint dismissal documents as required under the court's prior order, (filing no. 49 ), or show cause why such documents have not been filed. Any show cause doc uments filed by the parties shall explain not only why dismissal documents were not timely filed and cannot be filed at this time, but also why the parties failed to promptly advise the court of any problems purportedly justifying their delay in the absence of a court order demanding such an explanation. In the absence of a timely response to this order, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKH)
May 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The court has been advised that the parties in the above-captioned matter have reached a settlement of their claims. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: (1) Within thirty days of the date of this order the parties shall file a joint st ipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and provide a draft order to the undersigned magistrate judge which will fully dispose of the case; (2) Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice; (3) This case has been removed from the trial docket upon representation by the parties that the case has settled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKH)
April 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding MOTION for Reconsideration 43 of Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 40 . The court cannot proceed until the jurisdictional challenge raised by the defendant is resolved. IT THEREFORE HEREBY IS ORDERED: Any motion by the defendant to amend the pleadings shall be filed in accordance with this court's local rules by April 24, 2009. On or before May 8, 2009, the parties shall file their briefs and evidence on the stated issues. On or before May 22, 2009, the pa rties shall file any responsive briefs and evidence. Any reply briefs shall be filed on or before May 29, 2009. The pretrial conference and trial of this case are continued until further order of the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)
March 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding 33 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT THEREFORE HEREBY IS ORDERED: Defendants' motion for summary judgment, filing no. 33 , is granted in part, and defendants Jane Doe 1-10 are dismissed. In all other respects the motion is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKH)
February 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER-On the court's own motion, IT IS ORDERED: The pretrial conference is rescheduled from April 30, 2009 to May 1, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. in the chambers of the undersigned, 566 Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, Nebraska. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKH)
November 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting 30 Joint Oral Motion of the parties. The Rule 16 telephone planning conference is continued from December 30 to January 14, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the call. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)
October 6, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS ORDERED, the parties shall report to the court in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before October 20, 2008, or show cause why sanctions should not be imposed upon them in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) and 37(g). Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hansen v. Dohmen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meaghan Elizabeth Hansen
Represented By: Patricia A. Knapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linda Dohmen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?