ConSteel Erectors v. Scharpf's Construction et al
| ConSteel Erectors |
| Scharpf's Construction, Kraus-Anderson Construction, James Scharpf, Jason Rusnak, Menards and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America |
| 4:2008cv03038 |
| February 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Keith |
| David L. Piester |
| David L. Piester |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
SETTLEMENT ORDER. It is ordered that: (1)Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of this order, the parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) with the clerk of the court (and provide a copy to the ma gistrate judge and to United States District Judge Richard G. Kopf, the trial judge to whom this case is assigned), together with submitting to the trial judge a draft order which will fully dispose of the case;(2)Absent compliance with this order, t his case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice;(3)This case is removed from the court's November 16, 2009 trial docket upon representation by the parties that the case has settled.***Set Dismissal Papers Deadline -- due by 8/3/2009.Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, )
|
|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding 104 Motion to Extend. The parties have filed a joint motion for a 60-day continuance of their expert witness disclosure deadlines. (Filing No. 104 ). They have not requested a continuance of the remaining deadlines set forth in the court's progression order. The court notes that if the requested 60-day continuance is granted, rebuttal experts need not be disclosed until after the scheduled pretrial conference. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The parties 9; joint motion for a continuance of the expert witness disclosure deadlines, (filing no. 104 ), is granted, in part, as follows: a. Each plaintiff, counter-claimant and cross-claimant shall disclose any expert witnesses on or before August 1, 2009; b. Each defendant, counter-defendant, and cross-defendant shall disclose any expert witnesses on or before September 1, 2009; c. If necessary to refute the disclosed opinions of an expert witness of an opponent, a plaintiff, counter-claimant, or cro ss-claimant may disclose additional expert witnesses not later than September 15, 2009. 2) All other deadlines and dates set forth in the court's Amended Order Setting Final Schedule for Progression of a Civil Case, (filing no. 97 ), remain in effect. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKH)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER - Counsel shall confer and inform the undersigned within ten days of their joint, or if necessary, separate views on an appropriate progression schedule for the remainder of the case designated to go forward by the court's Memorandum and Order of March 24, 2009, filing no. 94 . ***Set Deadline: ( Case Management Deadline set for 4/7/2009.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKH)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER that pursuant to NEGenR 1.5(a)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 157, this case is referred to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska. This case shall be terminated for statistical purposes by the Clerk of the Court for the Distr ict of Nebraska. The Clerk of the Court for the District of Nebraska shall deliver the court file to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska. This case is removed from the District Courts trial docket for the week of July 20, 2009. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKH)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER-Claimants' motion, filing no. 88 , for leave to file an Amended Cross Claim against Scharpf's Construction, Inc., is granted. The Amended Cross Claim shall be filed forthwith. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKH)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER regarding filing 85 . The parties have not requested a jury trial in this matter, but the final progression order of January 13, 2009 inadvertently set the trial as a jury trial. IT THEREFORE HEREBY IS ORDERED: Paragraph number 8 of the final progression order, filing no. 85 , is amended as follows: 8. Non-jury trial is set to commence, at the court's call, during the week of July 20, 2009 for a duration of four days in Lincoln, Nebraska, before the Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge. Unless otherwise ordered, jury selection shall be at the commencement of trial. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKH)
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Kraus-Anderson's motion for default judgment (filing 81 ) is denied without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER regarding Motions. IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion to strike (filing 61 ) Defendants' index of evidence filed on September 4, 2008 (filing 59 ) is denied. 2. Plaintiff's motion to strike (filing 76 ) Exhibits 5, 6, and 14 from Defendants' index of evidence filed September 25, 2008 (filing 69 ), is denied. 3. Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (filing 67 ) is denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKL)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for an enlargement of time (filing 70 ) is granted, as follows: Plaintiff shall have until November 4, 2008, to respond to Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (filing 67 ). Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG, )
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER - The motion of defendants Kraus-Anderson Construction Company and Menards, Inc., filing no. 64 , for leave to amend counterclaim, is granted. The amended counterclain shall be filed forthwith. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (GJG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
