United States ex rel. Tufly Company v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company et al
| United States ex rel. Tufly Company |
| Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Zurich American Insurance and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company |
| 4:2008cv03048 |
| March 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Douglas |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| David L. Piester |
| Miller Act |
| 40 U.S.C. ยง 0270 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the parties' joint stipulation (filing 11 ) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to pay their own costs and attorney fees. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding 9 Stipulation. Pursuant to the Stipulation and Joint Motion by the parties providing that (1) the Plaintiff and the Defendants have agreed to resolve their disputes through binding arbitration, and (2) that this actio n should be stayed while the Plaintiff and Defendants proceed with arbitration, (filing no. 9 ), IT IS ORDERED: This action is stayed so that the Plaintiff and the Defendants may proceed with binding arbitration to resolve their disputes. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
