Hernandez v. Silverman et al
| Michael A. Hernandez |
| Brian Silverman, Kathreen Hutchinson, Steve Elmshaeuser, Ken Hart, Dave Eubanks, Len Tabor and Amy Ragsdale |
| 4:2008cv03099 |
| May 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Johnson |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Pro Se Docket |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER regarding 21 Objection. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff's Objection to Judgment (filing no. 21 ), construed as a Motion for Reconsideration, is denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKH)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's claims necessarily implicate the validity of his conviction and incarceration, the court cannot address them in an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, the court will dismiss Plaintiff 9;s claims without prejudice to reassertion in a habeas corpus or similar proceeding. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff's Complaint (filing no. 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice to reassertion in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff's pending Motions (filing nos. 9 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 18 .) are denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party with Form AO241 packet)(JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
