NE Colorado Cellular v. County of Saunders, Nebraska et al
| NE Colorado Cellular |
| County of Saunders, Nebraska and Board of Supervisors of the County of Saunders, Nebraska |
| 4:2008cv03123 |
| June 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Saunders |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| David L. Piester |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 47:0251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER. It is ordered that: (1)Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of this order, the parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) with the clerk of the court (and provide a copy to the magistrate ju dge and to United States District Judge Richard G. Kopf, the trial judge to whom this case is assigned), together with submitting to the trial judge a draft order which will fully dispose of the case;(2)Absent compliance with this order, this case (i ncluding all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice;(3)This case is removed from the court's trial docket upon representation by the parties that the case has settled. ***Set Dismissal Papers Deadline; due by 12/10/2008. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 21 Stipulation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's September 9, 2008 Order (filing no. 20 ) is amended as follows: 1. Initial discovery related to jurisdictional questions shall be completed by October 27, 2008. 2. Motions for summary judgment and accompanying briefs in support thereof shall be filed by November 10, 2008. 3. Responsive briefs to motions for summary judgment shall be filed by December 10, 2008.4. Reply briefs, if any, shall be filed by December 24, 2008. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER approving 19 Stipulation and discovery is permitted in this case, is as follows: 1. The parties shall be entitled to discovery related to jurisdictional questions, including those identified in Defendants' Affirmative Defenses. 2. The pa rties shall not be entitled to discovery related to Plaintiff's claims set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint as Count II (Telecommunications Act (Substantial Evidence)), Count IV (Telecommunications Act (Failure to Issue Written Decision)), an d Count V (State Law Claims), absent further order of the Court. 3. Unless otherwise resolved by summary judgment, the parties shall be entitled to discovery related to Plaintiff's claims set forth in Plaintiffs Complaint as Count I (Telecommuni cations Act (Unreasonable Discrimination)), Count III (Telecommunications Act (Prohibition on Provision of Personal Wireless Services)), Count VI (Substantive Due Process), Count VII (Procedural Due Process), Count VIII (Equal Protection), and Count IX (42 U.S.C. § 1983), but such discovery shall not commence until after the Court rules on any dispositive motions filed by either party regarding the Telecommunications Act claims. 4. Initial discovery on jurisdictional issues shall be complet ed by October 13, 2008. 5. Motions for summary judgment and accompanying briefs in support thereof shall be filed by October 27, 2008. 6. Responsive briefs to motions for summary judgment shall be filed by November 26, 2008. 7. Reply briefs to motions for summary judgment, if any, shall be filed by December 10, 2008. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
