Calderon v. Bakewell
| Raul I. Calderon |
| Dennis Bakewell |
| 4:2008cv03128 |
| June 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Lancaster |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner Raul I. Calderons Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing no. 1) is denied in all respects and this action is dismissed with prejudice. 2. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. 3. All other pending motions and objections are denied as moot.February 3, 2009Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(PCV, )
|
|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Notices of Appeal 35 , and 36 , construed as motions for interlocutory appeal, are denied. Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis 53 and Motion to Stay Proceedings for Interlocutor y Appeal 109 are denied as moot. The Clerk of the court is directed to forward Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Mandamus 108 , Brief in Support 110 , Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 111 , and Prisoner Account Statement 112 to the Ei ghth Circuit Court of Appeals. Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Petition 103 , Motion for Evidentiary Hearing 104 , and Motion to Produce 114 are denied. The Motion for Leave to File an Amended Petition is denied without pr ejudice to reassertion after Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment is resolved. Petitioner shall not file any motion without first seeking leave from the court to do so. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(KBJ)
|
|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's pending Motions are denied, 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 40 , 43 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 61 , 64 , 65 , 67 , 69 , 71 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 85 , 87 , [ 89], 91 , 92 , 99 , 100 , and 101 . On the court' own motion, etitioner shall have until November 28, 2008 to file a response to Respondents Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAE, ) Modified on 10/29/2008 to remove reference to Ex Parte. (JAE, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Calderon v. Bakewell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Raul I. Calderon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Dennis Bakewell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
