Adams v. Lancaster County Attoney Office et al
Gregory B. Adams, Sr. |
Lancaster County Attoney Office, Health and Human Services Administration, I.C.C.U. Region V, Carry Ropty, Charlene Hoskins and Felicia H. Roundtree |
4:2008cv03154 |
July 17, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Lancaster |
Richard G. Kopf |
Pro Se Docket |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER-Plaintiff's claims are dismissed without prejudice to reassertion in the appropriate state court forum. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Add Additional Defendants (filing no. 7 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKL) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have until September 30, 2008 to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: September 30, 2008: deadline for informing court of new address. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 9/30/2008.) Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy was not mailed to pro se party as there is no current address)(GJG, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.