Jackson v. Britten
| Michael T. Jackson |
| Fred Britten |
| 4:2008cv03155 |
| July 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Johnson |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 17 is granted. Petitioner's motion to appoint counsel 20 is denied without prejudice to reassertion before the Eighth Circuit. Petitioner's motion for certificate of appealability 22 is denied without prejudice to reassertion before the Eighth Circuit. The clerk of the court shall provide the Court of Appeals a copy of this memorandum and order. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(KBJ)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA 16 . Petitioner shall have until June 29, 2009, to file a motion for certificate of appealability and brief in support. In the event that petitioner fails to file a motion and brief as set forth in this Memo randum and Order, the Court will deny the issuance of a certificate of appealability without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management in this case with the following text: June 29, 2009: check for filing of motion for certificate of appealability.Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copies mailed as directed)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION- A separate order will be entered herein in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that upon initial review of the Petition for Writ ofHabeas Corpus 1 , the Court preliminarily determines that all four of petitioner's claims, as set forth in this memorandum and order, are potentially cognizable in federal court; the clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this memorandum and order and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to respondent and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail; by November 17, 2008, respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or an answer; the clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: November 17, 2008: deadline for respondent to file answer or motion for summary judgment; no discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the Court; see Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copies mailed as directed)(CJP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Britten | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael T. Jackson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Fred Britten | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
