Michener v. BryanLGH Health System
| Michelle R Michener |
| BryanLGH Health System |
| 4:2008cv03202 |
| September 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Lancaster |
| David L. Piester |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:2601 Family Medical Leave Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER TO WITHDRAW EXHIBITS - Counsel for parties, shall either 1) withdraw the following exhibits previously submitted in this matter within 14 calendar days of the date of this order, or 2) show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER. A conference call with counsel was held. On the oral motion of defense counsel, and without objection by plaintiff's counsel, IT IS ORDERED that the trial of this matter is continued to February 1, 2010, as the #2 case before all civil and criminal matters. If the one-day trial of Bamford v. Ponderosa, et al., Case No. 4:09CV3035, proceeds to trial on February 1, 2010, the trial of this case will commence on Tuesday, February 2, 2010. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, )
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendant's motion for summary judgment (filing 25 ) is denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER regarding 29 Motion for enlargement of time. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's unopposed motion for enlargement of time (filing 29 ) is granted, as follows: Plaintiff shall have until July 10, 2009, to respond to Defendant's motion for summary judgment (filing 25 ). Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKH)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER regarding 23 Motion to Continue. This matter is before the Court on the defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time to file its motions for summary judgment from June 8, 2009, to June 10, 2009 (Filing no. 23 ). The Court find s that the motion should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Motions for summary judgment shall be filed not later than June 10, 2009; 2. All other provisions of the Order Setting Schedule for Progression of Case (Filing 19 ) shall remain in effect. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKH)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 21 Motion to Continue. Motions for summary judgment shall be filed not later than June 8, 2009. All other provisions of the Order Setting Schedule for Progression of Case (Filing No. 19 ) shall remain in effect. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Michener v. BryanLGH Health System | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michelle R Michener | |
| Represented By: | Jeffery R. Kirkpatrick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BryanLGH Health System | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
