Printing Specialties & Paper Products Joint Employer and Union Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Goldenrod Printing, Inc.
Plaintiff: Printing Specialties & Paper Products Joint Employer and Union Health and Welfare Fund and Trustees Of the Printing Specialties and Paper Products Joint Employer and Union Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant: Goldenrod Printing, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2008cv03225
Filed: November 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: David L. Piester
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the parties' joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice (filing 38 ) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned case is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to pay its own costs. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
September 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting 32 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend. The parties have until September 23, 2009, in which to file their responsive trial briefs. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
September 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER granting 25 Defendant's Motion to Extend time in which to file initial trial briefs. The parties are given until September 16, 2009, to file their trial briefs in the above captioned matter. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
August 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 PRETRIAL ORDER - estimated length of trial is 2 hours. Court strikes jury demand of defendant without objection by the plaintiff. Non-Jury Trial set for 9/28/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, NE before Judge Richard G. Kopf.Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
December 29, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Upon the parties joint oral motion, the deadline for filing the report of parties planning conference is continued to January 14, 2009. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (CRZ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Printing Specialties & Paper Products Joint Employer and Union Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Goldenrod Printing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Printing Specialties & Paper Products Joint Employer and Union Health and Welfare Fund
Represented By: Jane L. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees Of the Printing Specialties and Paper Products Joint Employer and Union Health & Welfare Fund
Represented By: Jane L. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Goldenrod Printing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?