Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. et al v. Gist
Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. and Ameritas Investment Corp. |
Michael A Gist |
4:2008cv03249 |
December 11, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement Office |
Lancaster |
Richard G. Kopf |
David L. Piester |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 95 SETTLEMENT ORDER. The court has been advised that the parties in the above-captioned matter have reached a settlement of their claims. Accordingly,IT IS ORDERED that:(1)Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of this order, the parties shall fi le a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) with the clerk of the court (and provide a copy to the magistrate judge and to United States District Judge Richard G. Kopf, the trial judge to whom this case is assigned), toget her with submitting to the trial judge a draft order which will fully dispose of the case;(2)Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice;(3)This case is removed from the court's trial docket upon representation by the parties that the case has settled.***Set Dismissal Papers Deadline -- due by 1/18/2011.Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, ) |
Filing 73 ORDER granting 70 Motion to Continue the expert disclosure, discovery and dispositive and Daubert motion deadlines. The pretrial conference and trial settings remain unchanged. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ) |
Filing 71 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (TCL ) |
Filing 57 ORDER granting 56 Motion to Continue Jury Trial set for 2/28/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, NE before Judge Richard G. Kopf. Pretrial Conference set for 2/10/2011 at 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ) |
Filing 50 AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER - Defendant Arch Insurance Company's unopposed motion to amend the progression schedule, (filing no. 47 ), is granted, and the final progression order is amended as follows: The discovery and deposition deadline is Jul y 31, 2010. The jury trial of this case is continued and will commence before Judge Richard G. Kopf on December 6, 2010. The pretrial conference will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge in her chambers on November 22, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG) |
Filing 49 ORDER. It is ordered that: (1)The following matter previously scheduled before the undersigned is herewith referred to Judge Zwart, to wit,(A)Nature of hearing:Pretrial conference.(B)Date and time of hearing: Thursday, May 27, 2010, at 10:00 a.m.(C)P lace of hearing: Judge Zwart's chambers, Room 566, United States Courthouse and Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall, North, Lincoln, Nebraska.(2)Judge Zwart will issue a report and recommendation or order as is appropriate. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, ) |
Filing 24 FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER deposition deadline is January 29, 2010; Pretrial Conference set for 5/27/2010 at 12:00 PM before Judge Richard G. Kopf; Jury Trial set for 6/21/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, NE before Judge Richard G. Kopf. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.