Bush v. Nebraska et al
| Charlie B. Bush, Jr. |
| Nebraska and Paul D Merritt |
| 4:2009cv03074 |
| April 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Lancaster |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Pro Se Docket |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (filing no. 18 ) is granted. Plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $0.84 by August 31, 2009, unless an enlargement of time is granted in respons e to a written motion. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff's institution shall collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2,) quoted above, and shall forward those installme nts to the court. The Clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiff's institution and to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Plaintiff's Motion for Release Pending Appeal (filing no. 17 ) is denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as ordered)(GJG)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding initial review of Complaint. Plaintiff filed his Complaint in this matter on April 15, 2009. (Filing No. 1 .) Plaintiff has previously been given leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Filing No. 12 .) The court now co nducts an initial review of the Complaint to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff's Complaint (filing no. 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice t o reassertion in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. All Plaintiff's pending Motions are denied without prejudice to reassertion in his habeas corpus proceeding. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKH)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (filing no. 2 ) is granted. Plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $ 0.84 by June 22, 2009, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written motion. If the initial partial filing fee is not received by the specified deadline, this case is subject to dismissal. After payment of the initial partial fili ng fee, Plaintiff's institution shall collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and shall forward those installments to the court. The Clerk of the court is directed to send a c opy of this Memorandum and Order to the appropriate official at Plaintiff's institution. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: June 22, 2009: initial partial filing fee payment due. Plaintiff shall keep the court informed of his current address at all times, and all parties are bound by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and by the court's Local Rules while this case is pending. Plaintiff shall review the Notice Regarding Summons Forms attached to this Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Lancaster County Jail)(LKH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
