Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska et al v. Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska and UNeMed Corporation
Defendant: Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2009cv03075
Filed: April 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
County: Lancaster
Presiding Judge: David L. Piester
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER granting 120 Stipulation. The pretrial conference is continued, and will be held on April 19, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. The trial of this case is set to commence before the Honorable Richard G. Kopf at 9:00 a.m. on May 7, 2012.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
June 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER - The motion to withdraw filed by James A. Daire as counsel of record on behalf of Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. 118 is granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAE)
January 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 110 AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER: Jury Trial set for 3/19/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, NE before Judge Richard G. Kopf. Pretrial Conference set for 3/1/2012 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
December 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 107 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Siemens' motion 67 for partial summary judgment as to literal infringement of the 670 patent is granted; Siemens' motion 67 for partial summary judgment as to infringement of the 670 patent under the doctrine of e quivalents is granted; Siemens' objections to and motion to strike the Declaration of Dr. Markin 81 are denied as moot for the reason that the court did not rely on such testimony in reaching its decision on Siemens' motion for partial summary judgment. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KBJ)
November 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 104 MEMROANDUM AND ORDER - The parties stipulation 103 , is granted, and The deadline for final infringement contentions is continued from November 19, 2010, to December 3, 2010. The deadline for final invalidity contentions and any willfulness is continued from December 10, 2010, to December 24, 2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (KBJ)
September 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 98 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The court construes the following terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,614,415 (the 415 patent) as indicated in this Order. The court construes the following terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,985,670 (the 670 patent) as indicated in this Order . On or before October 1, 2010, counsel for both parties shall file simultaneous briefs addressing how the above-described constructions affect the pending motion for partial summary judgment 67 and the motion to strike Plaintiffs' evidence [ 81], and counsel for both parties shall file simultaneous reply briefs on or before October 12, 2010. The Clerk of Court shall adjust the court's internal computerized recordkeeping system to reflect that the response due date for the pending motion forpartial summary judgment 67 and motion to strike 81 is October 1, 2010, and the reply due date is October 12, 2010. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KBJ)
August 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 92 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The parties shall continue to actively engage in good faith to resolve their ongoing discovery issues. A motion shall be promptly filed if an impasse arises as to any discovery issue, or if any deadlines must be continued or changed in the court's progression schedule for this case. The objections 74 and 75 are denied without prejudice to filing motions, as needed, under paragraph (1) of this order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (KBJ)
May 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting 61 Motion for Protective Order Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
April 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- The defendant's motion for leave to file an Amended Answer to Complaint and Amended Counterclaims 50 is granted. The defendant's Amended Answer to Complaint and Amended Counterclaims, a copy of which is attached to its motion, shall be filed on or before April 12, 2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (KBJ)
January 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER. It is ordered that: (1)The following matter previously scheduled before the undersigned is herewith referred to Judge Zwart, to wit,(A)Nature of hearing:Pretrial conference.(B)Date and time of hearing: Thursday, August 25, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.( C)Place of hearing: Judge Zwart's chambers, Room 566, United States Courthouse and Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall, North, Lincoln, Nebraska.(2)Judge Zwart will issue a report and recommendation or order as is appropriate. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, )
November 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The parties' joint motion to continue, (filing no. 28 ), is granted, and the deadline for filing an Answer or Motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) or (e) is extended to November 23, 2009. Absent an evidenti ary showing of good cause, no further extensions of the Answer or Response deadline will be granted. Attached is a "Report of Parties' Rule 26(f) Planning Conference." Counsel are directed to meet and confer and file the report by December 08, 2009. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
September 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting 19 Joint Stipulation. Defendant's answer or motion under Rules 12(b)(6) or 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall be filed on or before October 26, 2009. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska et al v. Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska
Represented By: Andre R. Barry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNeMed Corporation
Represented By: Andre R. Barry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?