Brown v. Val Limited
| Lorinda Brown |
| Val Limited |
| 4:2009cv03081 |
| April 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Hall |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| David L. Piester |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
SETTLEMENT ORDER. It is ordered that: (1)Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of this order, the parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) with the clerk of the court (and provide a copy to the ma gistrate judge and to United States District Judge Richard G. Kopf, the trial judge to whom this case is assigned), together with submitting to the trial judge a draft order which will fully dispose of the case;(2)Absent compliance with this order, t his case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice;(3)This case is removed from the court's trial docket upon representation by the parties that the case has settled.***Set Dismissal Papers Deadline -- due by 12/9/2009. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER - The parties' joint motion for a continuance, (filing no. 24 ), is granted, and on or before November 6, 2009, the parties shall either advise the court that this case is settled, or the defendant shall file a motion addressing whether this case should be dismissed for lack of standing under Rules 12(b)(1)and/or 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendant claims the plaintiff lacks standing to pursue her claims, and therefore the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case. IT IS ORDERED: 1) The defendant is given until October 1, 2009, to file a motion addressing whether this case should be dismissed for lack of standing under Rules 12(b)(1) and/or 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2) The parties may, at this time, conduct discovery on the issue of standing. However, as to all other issues in this case, discovery is stayed pending a court ruling as the whether the plaintiff has standing to litigate her claims. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Val Limited | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lorinda Brown | |
| Represented By: | Stephan M. Nitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Val Limited | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
