Kriz v. 12th Judicial District Board of Mental Health of Box Butte Co.
Petitioner: Michael J. Kriz
Respondent: 12th Judicial District Board of Mental Health of Box Butte Co.
Case Number: 4:2009cv03094
Filed: May 12, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
County: Lancaster
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 10 Petitioner's Motion to Proceed IFP. Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel 11 is denied without prejudice to reassertion. The Clerk is directed to mail copies of this memorandum and order and the section 2254 petition to the respondent and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: 8/28/09: deadline for r espondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: 9/27/09: check for respondent to file answer and separate brief. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copies mailed as directed and to pro se party) (JSF)
June 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel 5 is denied without prejudice to reassertion. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (copy mailed to pro se party)(CJP)
May 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 2 is provisionally granted and Petitioner will not be required to pay the $5.00 fee at this time; the pending Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is deemed insufficient and the court will not act upon it; on or before June 22, 2009, Petitioner must submit a signed Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; in the Amended Petition, Petitioner must specify the respondent(s), the grounds for relief, the f acts supporting each ground, and the relief requested; failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of the Petition without further notice; the Clerk of the court is directed to send Petitioner a Form AO241 packet, Petition for Relief Fr om a Conviction or Sentence By a Person in State Custody; the Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: June 22, 2009: deadline for Petitioner to submit Amended Petition. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copies mailed as directed)(CJP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kriz v. 12th Judicial District Board of Mental Health of Box Butte Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael J. Kriz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: 12th Judicial District Board of Mental Health of Box Butte Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?