Information Technology, Inc. v. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. et al
| Information Technology, Inc. |
| Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Aurum Technology, LLC |
| 4:2009cv03127 |
| June 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Lancaster |
| David L. Piester |
| Richard G. Kopf (REFERRAL JUDGE) |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER granting 48 Motion to Extend Time to reply regarding MOTION to Dismiss Claims for Relief Nos. 2 through 6 of the Amended Counterclaim of Defendant Aurum Technology, LLC 44 . Information Technology, Inc. shall have until October 2, 2009, to file its reply in support of its motion to dismiss counterclaims. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER approving 40 Stipulated Standstill Agreement. The Motions for a Temporary Restraining Order (Filing No. 13 ) and for a Preliminary Injunction (Filing 19 ) are hereby withdrawn without prejudice and the Clerk shall terminate them. My judicial assistant shall schedule a telephone conference with counsel to address the scope and scheduling of discovery and a trial on the merits. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall not alter the status quo including, but not limited to, allowing the licenses between the parties to terminate. On or before 5:00 PM on Thursday, August 13, 2009, the parties shall advise t he undersigned whether they have reached a negotiated stand-still agreement. If such an agreement is reached, and the court approves such an agreement, the motion for temporary restraining order 13 and motion for preliminary injunction 19 shall be deemed withdrawn and the parties shall be governed by their negotiated stand-still agreement. On the other hand, if no such agreement is reached by 5:00 PM on Thursday, August 13, 2009, the court shall proceed to rule upon Aurum's motion for a temporary restraining order. Should the court be required to rule upon Aurum's motion for a temporary restraining order, the foregoing order requiring the parties not to alter the status quo shall remain in existence until the earlier of the courts ruling on Aurum's motion for a temporary restraining order or 5:00 PM on Monday, August 24, 2009. In addition, when ruling upon the motion for a temporary restraining order, the court will address further scheduling of the motion for preliminary injunction. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, )
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - After consultation with counsel, and with their agreement, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The plaintiff shall not alter the status quo, including, but not limited to, allowing leases or licenses between the parties to terminate. This o rder shall automatically dissolve at twelve midnight, central time, on Friday, August 7, 2009, unless extended by the court. 2. A hearing on the defendants' motion (filings 13 - 15 ) for a temporary restraining order will be held before the und ersigned at 2:00 P.M., central time, on Friday, August 7, 2009. The court has allocated no more than 2 hours for the hearing. Evidence will be presented by affidavit and not through live testimony. 3. The plaintiff may respond to the submission of th e defendants (by brief, evidence index and affidavits) and shall provide any response no later than 5:00 P.M. central time on Monday, August 3, 2009. The defendants may reply no later than 5:00 P.M., central time, on Wednesday, August 5, 2009. 4. Inasmuch as Judge Piester has announced his retirement, and I have taken over the handling of Judge Piesters cases, the Clerk is ordered to reassign this case to me. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
