Gonzalez v. Gage County, Nebraska, et al
Plaintiff: Kathleen A Gonzalez
Defendant: Richard T. Smith, Burdette Lee Searcey, Gerald Lamkin, Kent Harlan, Mark Meints, Jerry O. DeWitt, Wayne R. Price, Gage County Attorneys Office, Gage County Sheriff's Office and County of Gage, Nebraska
Case Number: 4:2009cv03146
Filed: July 15, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
County: Gage
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: David L. Piester
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 412 ORDER that Attorney Douglas Stratton has a pending case in this court and has not paid the 2013/2014 Attorney Assessment. Within 30 days from the date of this order, Attorney Douglas Stratton is directed to pay the $20.00 fee or show cause why he is unable to do so. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. Show Cause Deadline set for 6/23/2014. (BMH)
February 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 158 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The court has reviewed the docket sheet for this case and has concluded there is an attorney appearance error. Accordingly, on the court's own motion, Herbert J. Friedman, who does not represent the plaintiff or any other party in the above-captioned action, shall be terminated on the docket sheet of this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
February 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 153 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting the parties joint oral Motion to Consolidate Cases 152 . The cases identified in the caption of this Memorandum and Order are consolidated for all purposes. Dean v. Gage County, Nebraska, et al, 4:09cv3144 is designat ed as the "Lead Case," and the other three cases identified in the caption are each designated as a "Member Case." The court's CM/ECF System has the capacity for "spreading" text among consolidated cases. If properl y docketed, the documents filed in the Lead Case will automatically be filed in the Member Cases. To this end, the parties are instructed to file in the Lead Case, 4:09CV3144, Dean v. Gage County, Nebraska, et al, all further documents except those d escribed in paragraph 4 and to select the option "yes" in response to the System's question of whether to spread the text. The parties may not use the spread text feature to file complaints, amended complaints, and answers; to pay fili ng fees electronically using pay.gov; to file items related to service of process; or to file notices of appeal. If a party believes that an item in addition to those described in paragraph 4 should not be filed in all of these consolidated cases, the party must move for permission to file the item in only one of the cases. The motion must be filed in all of the consolidated cases using the spread text feature. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JSF)
November 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendants' motion to dismiss (filing 31 ) is granted in part and denied in part, as follows: The plaintiff's claim that the defendants violated her rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments is dismissed with prejudice, as barred by the statute of limitations. The Gage County Sheriff's Office and the Gage County Attorney's Office are dismissed from the action as non-suable entities. To the extent that the complaint alleges any state-law claims for false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, or other torts, those claims are dismissed without prejudice. In all other respects, the defendants' motion to dismiss is denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendants' motion to stay discovery, (filing no. 33 ), is granted. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
August 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Because of problems encountered with the court's CM/ECF electronic filing system, Defendants are granted an extension of time, until August 7, 2009, to respond to the plaintiff's complaint. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Gage County, Nebraska, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen A Gonzalez
Represented By: Douglas J. Stratton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard T. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burdette Lee Searcey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gerald Lamkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kent Harlan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Meints
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerry O. DeWitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wayne R. Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gage County Attorneys Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gage County Sheriff's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Gage, Nebraska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?