Bohlke v. Thurber et al
| Donald L. Bohlke |
| Michael Thurber, Terry Weber, Steve Free and Unknown |
| 4:2009cv03209 |
| October 8, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Lancaster |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is dismissed without prejudice; a separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (copy mailed to pro se party)(CJP)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff Donald L. Bohlke shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $1.17 by 12/17/2009, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written motion . The Clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiff's institution. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: Decemb er 17, 2009: initial partial filing fee payment due. The Plaintiff shall keep the court informed of his current address at all times. Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 12/17/2009. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party and to institution)(PCV, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
