Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC v. HDR, Inc. et al
| 4:2009cv03235 |
| November 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Patent Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 35:271 Patent Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Counsel for Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC shall file the Corporate Disclosure State on or before July 6, 2010 or show cause by written affidavit why they cannot comply with the rules of the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 25 Motion for Leave. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a supplemental index of evidence byor before May 27, 2010. Case Management Deadline set for 5/27/2010. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (PCV, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER - This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's unopposed motion for an extension of time to file brief in opposition to motion to dismiss 19 . The motion shall be granted. Plaintiff shall file its brief opposing Defendants' motion to dismiss 17 on or before April 21, 2010. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KBJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC v. HDR, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
