Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC v. HDR, Inc. et al
Case Number: 4:2009cv03235
Filed: November 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: Patent Office
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: Cheryl R. Zwart
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:271 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Counsel for Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC shall file the Corporate Disclosure State on or before July 6, 2010 or show cause by written affidavit why they cannot comply with the rules of the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
May 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER granting 25 Motion for Leave. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a supplemental index of evidence byor before May 27, 2010. Case Management Deadline set for 5/27/2010. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (PCV, )
April 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER - This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's unopposed motion for an extension of time to file brief in opposition to motion to dismiss 19 . The motion shall be granted. Plaintiff shall file its brief opposing Defendants' motion to dismiss 17 on or before April 21, 2010. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KBJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC v. HDR, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?