Campbell
| 4:2009cv03237 |
| November 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office |
| F. A. Gossett |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 28 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (SMS, )
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and this action is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (KBJ)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 16 Motion to Extend. Plaintiff shall file his Initial Brief on or before 4/22/2010. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JSF)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. If requested to do so by plaintiff's attorney, the U.S. Marshal shall serve process in this case without prepayment of fees. This order is entered without prejudice to the court later entering an order taxing costs in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (JAE)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Campbell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
