Farmers Cooperative Company v. Bartlett Grain Company, L.P.
| 4:2009cv03252 |
| December 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
ORDER TO WITHDRAW EXHIBITS OR TO SHOW CAUSE WHY EXHIBITS SHOULD NOT BE DESTROY- Pursuant to NECivR 79.1(f) or NECrimR 55.1(g), counsel for defendant, shall either 1) withdraw the following exhibits previously submitted in this matter within 14 cal endar days of the date of this order, or 2) show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed: Exhibit numbers 8, 21-23, 30, 48-49, 51 and 54, from Jury Trial held on May 1, 2012 - May 4, 2012. If counsel fails to withdraw these exhibits as direct ed or to show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed, the clerk's office is directed to destroy the listed exhibits without further notice to the parties or order from the court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (TCL )
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER - Plaintiff's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (filing 113 )is denied. Plaintiff's motion for new trial (filing 115 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Pretrial Order 77 - The final pretrial order is modified to conform to the foregoing memorandum. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (TEL)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER denying 73 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (TEL)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 56 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Farmers Coop's motion to compel (filing no. 29 ) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: a. If it has not yet done so, Bartlett's counsel shall certify its Rule 26(a) mandatory disclosures by February 14, 2 001. b. On or before February 28, 2011, Bartlett shall respond to Requests for Production Nos. 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 15, but only as to transactions involving Francis Searcey, 136 Group, Diller Grain Co., and Searcey Grain Co. for the time period between January 1, 2005 and September 30, 2007. c. Farmers Coops motion is denied in all other respects. Farmers Coop's motion for sanctions (filing no. 30 ) is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding outstanding discovery disputes.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER - The Motion, filing 26 , is sustained, and that the parties herein are granted leave to take the oral deposition of Francis Searcey at his place of confinement, currently The Federal Prison Camp in Duluth, Minnesota. The deposition of Francis Searcey shall by governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedures 30. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER withdrawing 21 Motion to Compel; withdrawing 23 Motion to Extend. The discovery deadline is set aside. Status Conference set for 1/13/2011 at 09:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Farmers Cooperative Company v. Bartlett Grain Company, L.P. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
