Doe v. Nebraska, State of et al
| 4:2010cv03004 |
| January 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER adopting 47 Findings and Recommendation. The plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution. Final judgment will be entered by separate document. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
47
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiffs complaint be dismissed for want of prosecution. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that on or before October 5, 2010, the plaintiff shall either file a motion for voluntary dismissal of this case, or show cause why his case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. In the absence of timely compliance with this order, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB, )
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - These six cases are consolidated for all purposes including trial and discovery. Counsel and the Clerk are ordered to proceed as follows when filing documents and otherwise processing these cases. John Doe, et al., v. State of Nebraska, et al., Case No. 8:09CV456 (D. Neb. 2009) is hereby designated as the "Lead Case." The other five cases are each designated as a "Member Case". The motions to consolidate (filings No. 82 and 88 in 8:09CV456; filing 11 in 4:09CV3258; filing 2 in 4:09CV3266) are granted as provided herein but otherwise denied. By agreement of the parties, any demand for a jury is withdrawn. The consolidated cases are designated as non- jury cases. By agreement of the parties, all p laintiffs shall have the benefit of the preliminary injunction previously issued in the "Lead Case." This matter is referred to Judge Zwart for further progression and the issuance of scheduling packet tailored to the needs of the consolida ted cases. Each of the defendants is given until February 8, 2010 to answer or further plead. The motion for extension of time (filing 12 in 4:09CV3266) is granted as provided herein and otherwise denied. The motion to intervene and related motion to use fictitious names (filings 70 and 71 in 8:09CV456) are denied without prejudice because no proposed pleading was filed as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(c). The motions to withdraw as attorneys (filings 94 and 304 in 8:09CV456) are granted. The motion to remand (filing 8 in 4:09CV3266) is denied. Case Management Deadline (Answer) set for 2/8/2010. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Defendant's Motion to Vacate Temporary Restraining Order 3 . I heard and recorded oral argument by telephone on that motion this morning. Intending no disrespect, but as I have previously explained, broad injunctive relief of the type ordered by Judge Murphy is unjustified under both federal and state law. The motion (filing 3 ) to vacate temporary restraining order is granted and the Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order entered by Judge Murphy on January 4, 2010 is vacated. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doe v. Nebraska, State of et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
