Basler et al v. Ellingson et al
Case Number: 4:2010cv03028
Filed: February 10, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Cheryl R. Zwart
Presiding Judge: Cheryl R. Zwart
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The clerk of the court shall forward Defendants suggestion in bankruptcy (filing 45 ) to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA) Modified on 3/14/2011 to change document name (AOA).
November 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This case has been referred to the bankruptcy court (filing no. 43 ). Accordingly, the telephonic status conference set for November 24, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. is cancelled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (AOA)
April 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 5/17/2010. If a planning conference is needed, the parties shall contact chambers by 5/10/2010 to arrange a conference call. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAE)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Basler et al v. Ellingson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?