City of Lincoln, Nebraska v. Windstream Nebraska
Case Number: 4:2010cv03030
Filed: February 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: Cheryl R. Zwart
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 147 ORDER granting 146 Stipulation for Dismissal - The above-captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (TEL)
September 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 144 SETTLEMENT ORDER. It is ordered that: (1)Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of this order, the parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) with the clerk of the court (and provide a copy to the m agistrate judge and to United States District Judge Richard G. Kopf, the trial judge to whom this case is assigned), together with submitting to the trial judge a draft order which will fully dispose of the case;(2)Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice;(3)This case is removed from the court's September 12, 2011 trial docket upon representation by the parties that the case has settled.***Set Dismissal Papers Deadline -- due by 10/6/2011. Termed 9/12/2011 non-jury trial date. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, )
August 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 143 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Magistrate Judge's memorandum and order (filing 116 ) shall not be disturbed and is hereby sustained; and Plaintiff's statement of objections to, or appeal from, the Magistrate Judges order (filing 131 ) is denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (TEL)
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 142 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant's motion in limine to exclude the expert testimony of Garth Ashpaugh (filing 123 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion at trial. Plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude the expert testimony of Daniel J. Caldwell and Jeffrey L. Pursley (filing 126 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion at trial. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (TEL)
August 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER granting 118 Motion for Leave. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
August 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 116 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 107 Motion for Reconsideration. Paragraphs 1 through 4 of the courts prior order, 105 , remain in effect. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
July 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER granting 104 plaintiff's oral motion for late disclosure of an additional expert, with scheduling deadlines. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
March 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER granting 83 Motion to Extend; Plaintiff shall have until April 1, 2011, to file a reply regarding 75 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's 84 Motion for Leave is granted; Plaintiff shall have until April 1, 2011, to file a sur-reply brief regarding 71 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (ADB, )
January 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER granting 68 Motion to set status conference. A telephonic status conference is set for February 15, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the call. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
November 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 67 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (DMS)
November 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER that Plaintiff's motion to dismiss 63 is granted; Defendants Windstream Communications, Inc., and Windstream Corporation are dismissed from the action without prejudice. Pursuant to the parties' joint stipulation 61 , the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Winstream Communications, Inc. 51 and Windstream Corporation 54 are withdrawn. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JSF)
October 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER granting 59 that Plaintiff's motion for an enlargement of time. Plaintiff shall have until November 5, 2010, to respond to motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Windstream Communications, Inc. 51 and Windstream Corporation 54 . Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAE)
August 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 49 AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER granting 48 Motion to Amend; The pretrial conference and jury trial remain scheduled for March 24, 2011 andApril 4, 2011, respectively. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB, )
August 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendants motion to strike the plaintiffs demand for a jury trial 17 is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
July 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- The plaintiffs amended motion to amend, (filing no. 21 ), is granted in part and denied in part as follows: a. The motion is denied as to the addition of proposed defendants Windstream Midwest, Inc, Windstream Holding of Midwes t, Inc., and Windstream Systems of the Midwest, Inc. b. The plaintiff is granted leave to add proposed defendants Windstream Corporation and Windstream Communications, Inc. The plaintiffs motion to amend, (filing no. 19 ), is denied as moot. The plaintiff shall have seven (7) days from today to file an amended complaint in compliance with this order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)
June 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER granting 23 Motion to Amend ; The deadline for Windstream to move to amend its answer is extended to 14 days after a denial of the Plaintiffs Amended Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint or, in the event that the Plaintiffs motion is granted, 14 days after Windstream answers the Plaintiffs amended complaint. The deadline for mandatory disclosures is extended to July 15, 2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: City of Lincoln, Nebraska v. Windstream Nebraska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?