Furby et al v. Lang et al
| Stephen E Furby and Rebecca S Woita |
| Catherine D Lang, Nebraska Department of Labor, State of Nebraska and State of Nebraska, Department of Labor, Retirement Plan |
| 4:2010cv03063 |
| April 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| F. A. Gossett |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting Notice of Case Dismissal 35 and denying as moot Motion to Dismiss 37 in case 4:10-cv-03063-LSC-FG3; granting Notice of Case Dismissal 26 and denying as moot Motion to Dismiss 27 in case 4:10- cv-03192-LSC-FG3. IT IS ORDERED: The Plaintiffs' Notices of Dismissal, construed as motions to dismiss (Filing No. 26 in Case No. 4:10cv3192 and Filing No. 35 in Case No. 4:10cv3063) are granted; The above-captioned actions are dismissed without prejudice, the parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees; and All other pending motions are denied as moot. Member Cases: 4:10-cv-03063-LSC-FG3, 4:10-cv-03192-LSC-FG3 Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (TEL)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER - The motion for consolidation (Doc. 5 in Case No. 4:10-cv-03192) is granted, as follows: Cases Nos. 4:10-cv-03063 and 4:10-cv-03192 are hereby consolidated for discovery, trial, and all other purposes. The cases will be tried to the court in Lincoln, Nebraska. Case No. 4:10-cv-03063 is hereby designated as the "Lead Case." Case No. 4:10-cv-03192 is hereby designated as the "Member Case." The court's CM/ECF System has the capacity for "spreading" text a mong the consolidated cases. If properly docketed, the documents filed in the Lead Case will automatically be filed in all Member Cases. To this end, the parties are instructed to file all further documents (except those described in paragraph 4 belo w) in the Lead Case, No. 4:10-cv-03063, and to select the option "yes" in response to the System's question whether to spread the text. The parties may not use the spread text feature to file complaints, amended complaints, and answers ; to pay filing fees electronically using pay.gov; or to file items related to service of process. If a party believes that an item in addition to those described in paragraph 4 should not be filed in all the consolidated cases, the party must move for permission to file the item in one or more member cases. The motion must be filed in all the consolidated cases using the spread text feature.Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (AOA)
|
|
Filing
28
SCHEDULING ORDER - plaintiffs are given until Friday, 1/7/2011 to file any Objection to the Motion to Consolidate filed in Mulligan v. Lang, 4:10cv3192. If the Furby plaintiffs do not object to consolidation of this case with Mulligan v. Lang, they are requested to file a Notice to that effect. (Case Management Deadline set for 1/7/2011.) (Attachments: # 1 10cv3192 Motion to Consolidate, # 2 10cv3192 Brief # 3 10cv3192 Response, # 4 10cv3192 Complaint, Mulligan v. Lang)Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (CLS, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
