Ginsburg
| Mr. Robert Ginsburg |
| Concordia University |
| 4:2010cv03064 |
| April 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Motion for Attorney Fees 25 . IT IS ORDERED that by separate document, judgment shall be entered in favor of Concordia and against Ginsburg. Ginsburg shall pay, through counsel, $2,185 to defendant Concordia University. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (TEL)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 23 Motion for Summary Judgment; regarding 25 Motion for Attorney Fees: On or before January 19, 2011, Concordia University shall submit an itemized billing statement in support of its motion for attorney fees along w ith any additional briefing or explanation it believes is warranted. The plaintiff shall have until January 31, 2011 to file any objection, brief, or other response to Concordias motion for attorney fees. No reply brief shall be filed absent leave of the court for good cause shown. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss. To the extent Concordia alleges the plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim, the motion is granted. The plaintiff is given 15 days from the date of this order to file an a mended complaint which states a claim. If the plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint, or if his timely filed amended complaint is again successfully challenged by the defendant as failing to state a claim, Ginsburg's claims against Concordia will be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Concordias motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), and its motion for attorney fees, are denied without prejudice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
|
|
Filing
18
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The dispositive motion now pending (filing no. 12 ) cannot be ruled on by the undersigned magistrate judge unless both parties consent to final disposition by a magistrate judge. If the parties consent to final disposition of the case by the undersigned magistrate judge, on or before July 6, 2010, they shall complete the attached "CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE." In the absence of timely submitting the attached form in accordance with paragraph (1), the case will be reassigned to a district judge. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ginsburg | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Concordia University | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mr. Robert Ginsburg | |
| Represented By: | Robert W. Chapin, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
