Kon v. Douglas County Jail et al

Kon v. Douglas County Jail et al

Plaintiff:	Joseph Bior Kon
Defendant:	Douglas County Jail and Weston
Case Number:	4:2010cv03149
Filed:	August 2, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge:	Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge:	Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 15, 2010	Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
August 20, 2010	Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Complaint 1 filed by Joseph Bior Kon. Plaintiff must submit a signed request to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit of poverty in support thereof, or tender the $350.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the court on or before September 9, 2010. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 9/9/2010: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party with AO240 Form) (JAB)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 15, 2010

Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )

August 20, 2010

Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Complaint 1 filed by Joseph Bior Kon. Plaintiff must submit a signed request to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit of poverty in support thereof, or tender the $350.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the court on or before September 9, 2010. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 9/9/2010: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party with AO240 Form) (JAB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kon v. Douglas County Jail et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas County Jail
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Weston
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Bior Kon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?