Gillispie v. Bakewell
Steven Ray Gillispie |
Dennis Bakewell |
Nebraska Attorney General |
4:2010cv03185 |
September 22, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
4 Lincoln Office |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G. Kopf |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Petitioner Steven Ray Gillispie's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing no. 1 ) is denied in all respects and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (TEL) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Clerk is directed to mail copies of this Memorandum and Order and the Petition to Respondent and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. The Clerk of the court is dire cted to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: November 29, 2010: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: January 3, 2011: check for Respondent to file answer and separate brief. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed) (JSF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.