Boles v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
| Scott A. Boles |
| UNUM Life Insurance Company of America |
| 4:2011cv03031 |
| March 9, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER denying 78 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The motion to withdraw filed by Robert A. Stark as counsel of record on behalf of Defendant UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, (filing no. 76 ), is granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Any motion to compel responses to the plaintiff's discovery requests shall be served on or before October 1, 2012. The clerk shall set a case management deadline of October 5, 2012 for determining if this case is ready fo entry of a final briefing schedule. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (DMS)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiff shall serve his additional discovery requests on or before June 15, 2012. Any motion to compel responses to the plaintiff's discovery requests shall be served on or before July 31, 2012. The clerk shall set a case management deadline of August 1, 2012 for determining if this case is ready for entry of a final briefing schedule. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant UNUM's Motion for Judicial Determination of ERISA Application and Preemption (filing 20 ), construed as a motion for partial summary judgment, is granted. Boles' second claim for relief is preempted by ER ISA. Boles shall file an amended complaint on or before February 20, 2012. If Boles fails to file an amended complaint in accordance with this memorandum and order, I will dismiss his second claim for relief and this case shall proceed on his first claim for relief only (see filing 1 ). Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The parties will complete their discovery regarding the application of ERISA by September 5, 2011, and, if necessary, will move for a determination on that issue by October 5, 2011. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Boles v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scott A. Boles | |
| Represented By: | Shawn D. Renner |
| Represented By: | Keith T. Peters |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America | |
| Represented By: | Steven D. Davidson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
