Hossaini v. Vaelizadeh

Hossaini v. Vaelizadeh

Plaintiff:	Mahnaz Beigi Hossaini
Defendant:	Adel Vaelizadeh
Case Number:	4:2011cv03052
Filed:	April 8, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge:	Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge:	Cheryl R. Zwart
Nature of Suit:	Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 4, 2011	Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 6 motion to take judicial notice; denying 16 motion to extend; denying 2 motion to disqualify, and denying 4 to the extent it seeks to quash service of process. The parties shall further brief the issues raised and/or implicated by filing 4 in accordance with the schedule and content of this memorandum and order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
May 16, 2011	Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding MOTION to Quash Service and to Dismiss 4 , MOTION Motion to Disqualify Paul E Galter and His Firm 2 , and MOTION Motion to Take Judicial Notice 6 . On or before May 31, 2011, the plaintiff shall respond to the d efendant's pending motions, and the jurisdictional, abstention and claim or issue preclusion issues identified by the court. The defendant may reply to plaintiff's response, with such reply to be filed on or before June 13, 2011. The issues identified in this memorandum and order will be deemed fully submitted on June 14, 2011. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 4, 2011

Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 6 motion to take judicial notice; denying 16 motion to extend; denying 2 motion to disqualify, and denying 4 to the extent it seeks to quash service of process. The parties shall further brief the issues raised and/or implicated by filing 4 in accordance with the schedule and content of this memorandum and order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)

May 16, 2011

Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding MOTION to Quash Service and to Dismiss 4 , MOTION Motion to Disqualify Paul E Galter and His Firm 2 , and MOTION Motion to Take Judicial Notice 6 . On or before May 31, 2011, the plaintiff shall respond to the d efendant's pending motions, and the jurisdictional, abstention and claim or issue preclusion issues identified by the court. The defendant may reply to plaintiff's response, with such reply to be filed on or before June 13, 2011. The issues identified in this memorandum and order will be deemed fully submitted on June 14, 2011. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hossaini v. Vaelizadeh
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mahnaz Beigi Hossaini
Represented By:	Paul E. Galter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Adel Vaelizadeh
Represented By:	Richard G. Elie
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?