Coleman v. Astrue
| Steven P. Coleman, Jr. |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 4:2011cv03077 |
| May 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER before the court on plaintiff's appeal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) from the Social Security Administration's denial of of his request for disability benefits. This case is remanded to the Secretary for further review as set forth herein. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 . THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: Filing No. 2 , the plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, is granted. Following completion of the service and summons, the Ma rshal shall serve the United States, without payment of costs or fees. Service shall be effected pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i) regarding "[s]erving the United States, Its Agencies, Corporations, Officers, or Employees." That upon receipt of a certified copy of the transcript of the records, the Clerk of Court shall enter its standard briefing order in this case. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TEL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
