Harden v. Britten et al
Petitioner: Robert Harden
Respondent: Fred Britten and Robert Houston
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Case Number: 4:2011cv03084
Filed: June 6, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Petitioner's Motion to Withdraw Document 26 construed as a motion to voluntarily dismiss, is granted. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. All other pending motions are denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
September 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel 16 is denied. Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Supplement Habeas Corpus Information 17 is denied without prejudice to reassertion as set forth in this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
August 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Notice of Appeal, 9 , construed as a Motion forInterlocutory Appeal, is denied. The Clerk of the court is directed not to process the Notice of Appeal. Petitioner's Motion for Injunction 11 is denied. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(JAE)
July 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Upon initial review of the Petition (Filing No. 1 ), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioners claims, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal court; The Clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this Memorandum and Order and the Petition to Respondents and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail; By September 9, 2011, Respondents shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in s upport of an answer. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: September 9, 2011: deadline for Respondents to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment; If Respondents elect to file a motion for summary judgment, the procedures set forth within the order shall be followed by Respondents and Petitioner. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. and Petitioners Motion to Appoint Counsel (Filing No. 6 ) is denied. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed)(MKR, )
June 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying the Petitioner's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner is granted until July 25, 2011 to pay the $5.00 filing fee. Petitioner is warned that if the fee is not paid as required, the court may dismiss this case without further notice; Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 7/25/2011; deadline for Petitioner topay $5.00 filing fee. No further review of this case will take place until the filing fee is paid. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harden v. Britten et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Nebraska Attorney General
Represented By: Jon C. Bruning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Harden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Fred Britten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Houston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?