Hunt v. Houston et al
| Robert E. Hunt |
| Sam Shaw, Elizabeth Stanosheck, Dennis Bakewell, Daniel Danaher, John or Jane Doe, Frank Hopkins, Robert Houston, Tammy Kluver, Dr. Randy Kohl, Shawn Luebbe, Dwight Rickard and Larry Wayne |
| 4:2011cv03086 |
| June 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is permitted leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has already submitted the initial partial filing fee of $450.00. Plaintiff's institution shall collect the remaining $5.00 in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and shall forward those installments to the court. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (Copy provided to Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and Plaintiff's Institution as directed) (Copy mailed to: Jim Worster, Accounting/Finance Manager, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Central Office Accounting, PO Box 94661, Lincoln, NE 68508.) (TEL)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying the Plaintiff's 36 Motion to Compel. Defendant's 37 Objection is granted. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying the Plaintiff's 32 Motion for Reconsideration and 33 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's claims against Defendants for monetary damages in their official capacities are dismissed. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment claims against Defendants for monetary damages in their ind ividual capacities and against Defendants for injunctive relief in both their official and individual capacities may proceed and service is now warranted. To obtain service of process on Defendants, Plaintiff must complete and return the summons for ms which the Clerk of the court will provide. The Clerk of the court shall send FOURTEEN (14) summons forms and FOURTEEN (14) USM-285 forms to Plaintiff together with a copy of this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff shall, as soon as possible, complete the forms and send the completed forms back to the Clerk of the court. In the absence of the forms, service of process cannot occur. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: &q uot;January 4, 2012: Check for completion of service of summons." Plaintiff's Request to Appoint Counsel (filing no. 1 at CM/ECF pp. 17 18) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motions for Leave to Add Exhibits (filing nos. 7 , 8 , 9 ) are granted. All other pending Motions are denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party along with summonses and 285 forms)(GJG)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding: Complaint - Pro Se 1 filed by Robert E. Hunt. Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Complaint on or before July 14, 2011. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 7/14/2011: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party with AO240 form)(JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
