Holladay v. Bakewell
Petitioner: Larry Holladay
Respondent: Dennis Bakewell
Case Number: 4:2011cv03103
Filed: July 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal IFP (filing no. 27 ) is granted and Petitioner is permitted to appeal IFP. Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability (filing no. 31 ), is denied without prejudic e to reassertion before the Eighth Circuit. The Clerk of the court shall provide the Court of Appeals a copy of this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party; sent electronically to the 8th Circuit)(GJG)
April 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA 26 . Petitioner shall have until May 3, 2012, to file a motion for Certificate of Appealability and brief in support. In the event that Petitioner fails to file a motion and brief, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, the court will deny the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management in this case with the following text: May 3, 2012: check for filing of motion for Certificate of Appealability. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
March 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner Larry Holladay's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing no. 8 ) is denied in all respects and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
December 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider (filing no. 18 ), is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
October 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Upon initial review of the Amended Petition (filing no. 8 ), the court preliminarily determines that Claims One through Three, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal court. Petitioner&# 039;s request to appoint counsel is denied without prejudice to reassertion. The Clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this Memorandum and Order and the Petition to Respondents and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail . By November 14, 2011, Respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: November 14 , 2011: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If Respondent elects to file an answer, the procedures set out in this Memorandum and Order shall be followed by Respondent and Petitione r. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case managementdeadline in this case using the following text: December 19, 2011: check for Respondent to file answer and separate brief. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party and as directed)(GJG)
August 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The pending Petition is deemed insufficient and the court will not act upon it. On or before September 6, 2011, Holladay shall submit a completely new amended petition for writ of habeas corpus that is originally signed under p enalty of perjury. In the amended petition, Holladay shall specify the convictions and sentences that he is challenging. Holladay is warned that his failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of his Petition without further notice. Th e Clerk of the Court is directed to send to Holladay the Form AO 241, Petition for Relief From a Conviction or Sentence By a Person in State Custody. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: September 6, 2011: deadline for Petitioner to submit amended Petition. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party along with form)(GJG)
July 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (filing no. 2 ) is provisionally granted and Petitioner will not be required to pay the $5.00 fee at this time. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holladay v. Bakewell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dennis Bakewell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Larry Holladay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?