Osbourne v. Sweet Express, L.L.C., et al
| Samuel Osbourne |
| Sweet Express, L.L.C., and Alija Alagic |
| 4:2011cv03113 |
| July 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
SECOND AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER granting 18 Second Unopposed Motion to Amend: Depositions due 10/2/2012.Jury Trial set for 11/26/2012 at 09:00 AM before Senior Judge Kopf. Pretrial Conference set for 11/13/2012 at 9:00 AM by WebEx Conference before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. An email will be sent to counsel of record with the instructions and codes for participating in the pretrial conference by WebEx.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Amend.Depositions due March 2, 2012.Jury Trial(3 days) set for August 13, 2012 at 09:00 AM at the Robert V. Denney Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, NE before Judge Richard G. Kopf. Pretrial Conference set for July 31, 2012 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart.Status Conference set for March 8, 2012 at 11:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
