Kislyak v. Powell et al
Plaintiff: Pavel Kislyak
Defendant: Ross A. Luzum, Nebraska State, C. Jo Petersen, Hamilton County Court and Michael H. Powell
Case Number: 4:2012cv03007
Filed: January 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Warren K. Urbom
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Kislyak failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Order of Dismissal. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (AOA)
January 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiff, Pavel Kislyak, is directed either to (1) tender a $350.00 fee to the clerk of the court or (2) submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit of poverty in support thereof on or before Febr uary 22, 2012. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to the plaintiff, Pavel Kislyak, the Form AO 240, Application to Proceed With out Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: February 22, 2012: deadline for payment or filing of IFP application. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy with forms mailed pro se party as directed)(AOA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kislyak v. Powell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ross A. Luzum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nebraska State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Jo Petersen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hamilton County Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael H. Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pavel Kislyak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?