Matthies v. Houston
Petitioner: Gregory M. Matthies
Respondent: Robert Houston
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Case Number: 4:2012cv03069
Filed: April 10, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Lyle E. Strom
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's "Motion to Alter and Amend Judgment" (Filing No. 27 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
March 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER AND JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the memorandum opinion 25 entered herein this date, IT IS ORDERED: The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner's Motion for Telephonic Hearing (Filing No. 23 ) is denied as moot. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this matter. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
February 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Matthies will have 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus that presents a cognizable claim for relief. Matthies' amended petition should se t forth the date of the parole decision he seeks to challenge in this matter, whether he attended and spoke at the parole hearing, and whether the parole board provided him with a statement of reasons for the denial of parole. If Matthies fails to fi le an amended petition within 30 days, this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The clerks office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: March 8, 2013: deadline f or Matthies to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. Respondent need not respond to Matthies' amended petition unless directed to do so by the Court after the Court conducts an initial review of the amended petition. Matthies' "Motion to Rule on State Remedies" and "Motion for Telephonic Hearing" are denied without prejudice to reassertion (Filing Nos. 20 and 21 ). Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
July 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Upon initial review of the petition (Filing No. 1 ), the Court preliminarily determines that petitioner's claims, as set forth in this memorandum and order, are potentially cognizable in federal court. T he clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this memorandum and order and the petition to respondent and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. By August 20, 2012, respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or st ate court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: August 20, 2012: deadline for respondent to file state court records in support of answer o r motion for summary judgment. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: September 19, 2012, check for respondent to file answer and separate brief. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the Court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed)(TCL )
June 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's Motion to AppointCounsel 4 is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
May 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The application to proceed in forma pauperis (Filing No. 2 ) is provisionally granted, but petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee by July 2, 2012. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: July 2, 2012: deadline for payment of $5.00 filing fee. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matthies v. Houston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Houston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gregory M. Matthies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Nebraska Attorney General
Represented By: Jon C. Bruning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?