Moen v. Lancaster County Corrections
| Erick Moen |
| Lancaster County Corrections |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 4:2012cv03079 |
| April 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Moen's Petition is dismissed without prejudice because he failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Petitioner's application to proceed IFP (Filing No. 2 ) is denied. Petitioner is granted until June 8, 2012, to pay the $5.00 filing fee. Petitioner is warned that if the fee is not pa id as required, the court may dismiss this case without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: June 8, 2012: deadline for Petitioner to pay $5.00 filing fee. No further review of this case will take place until the filing fee is paid.Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
