Sherrod v. Pearl et al
| James E. Sherrod |
| LCC and Mario Pearl |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 4:2012cv03121 |
| June 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Warren K. Urbom |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON INITIAL REVIEW - 1. Sherrod's Motions to Amend (Filing Nos. 7 and 8 ) are granted to the extent they are consistent with this Memorandum and Order on Initial Review. 2. Sherrod's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Filin g No. 6 ) is denied as moot. 3. Sherrod's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without prejudice to reassertion of a subsequent petition upon authorization by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order on Initial Review. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Declaration in Support Thereof (filing no. 2 ) is provisionally granted and Sherrod will not be required to pay the $5.00 fee at this time. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
