Woolman v. Bryan LGH et al
Michael B. Woolman |
Bryan LGH, Dr. Quinn and Sean Fisher |
4:2012cv03140 |
July 10, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
4 Lincoln Office |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G. Kopf |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is permitted leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. His Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 9 ) is granted to the extent it is consistent with this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff 039;s Motion for Bill of Costs (Filing No. 10 ) is denied. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (Filing No. 11 ) is denied. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Judgment (Filing No. 12 ), construed as a Motion for Relief Under Rule 60(b), is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party) (Copy mailed to USCA 8th Circuit as directed) (TEL) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Complaint (filing no. 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (TEL) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is provisionally granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party) (TEL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.