Howard v. Houston
Petitioner: Stuart D. Howard
Respondent: Robert P. Houston
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Case Number: 4:2012cv03194
Filed: September 11, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER that the case isclosed and the appeal time has expired. It is therefore ordered that the State Court Records 10 be returned to Nathan A. Liss, counsel for Respondent, for appropriate disposition. The State Court Records may be picked up in Lincoln, Nebraska. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed with prejudice, and a separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. The court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this matter. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
March 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 25 Petitioner's Renewed Motion to Appoint Counsel and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
January 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 13 Motion for Hearing. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB, )
October 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that upon initial review of the Petition (filing no. 1), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal court. By December 10, 2012, Respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 10, 2012: deadl ine for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If Respondent elects to file an answer then by December 10, 2012, Respondent shall file all state courtrecords which are relevant to the cognizable claims. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: January 10, 2013: check for Respondent to file answer and separate brief. Petitioner's 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel is denied without prejudice to reassertion. Petitioner's 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and 7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis are denied as moot. Petitioner paid the $5.00 filing fee on October 12, 2012. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(copy mailed to respondent and Nebraska Attorney General as directed)(ADB, )
September 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that petitioner shall tender the $5.00 fee to the Clerk of the court or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit of poverty in support thereof on or before October 14, 2012. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: October 14, 2012: deadline to submit IFP application or pay $5.00 filing fee. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party with Form AO240)(ADB, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard v. Houston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Nebraska Attorney General
Represented By: Jon C. Bruning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert P. Houston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Stuart D. Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?