Myers Construction, Inc. v. Antonov
||AV Transportation, Inc. and Anton Antonov, FL
||Myers Construction, Inc.
||November 29, 2012
||Nebraska District Court
||4 Lincoln Office
||Warren K. Urbom
||Cheryl R. Zwart
|Nature of Suit:
||Personal Property: Other
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 8, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Defendant's 31 Motion to Compel. On or before August 23, 2013, the plaintiff shall provide to the defendants a copy of the Bill of Lading for the shipment of the telehandler at issue in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)
|September 3, 2013
ORDER - On or before September 13, 2013, the parties shall file a notice with the court stating whether this case must be stayed pursuant to the insurer receivership/liquidation orders of the Texas court, along with copies of any Texas court orde rs on this issue. If the case is not stayed by the Texas orders, the parties shall contact my chambers during the week of September 16, 2013 to set a conference call for discussing further case progression. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)
|November 13, 2013
ORDER - The pretral conference and trial are continued pending further order of the court. The parties are instructed to contact the court within ten (10) days after the stay is lifted. The telephonic status conference set for November 13, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. is canceled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (BHC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.